Manchester City v Juventus tips – City can claim Champions League win

Manchester City can enjoy a Champions League flyer

Man City

View Odds

Betting Tip: Man City @ 4/5 with bet365

Sergio Aguero will be unavailable for Tuesday night’s clash against Juventus, with the Argentine getting a kick on the knee at Selhurst Park last Saturday.

However, David Silva and Raheem Sterling are available which makes City an exciting proposition even at odds of 4/5.

Manuel Pellegrini’s side have been untouchable in the Premier League so far, winning all five of their matches and not conceding a single goal.

It’s pretty amazing stuff and they will now aim to get off to the perfect start in the Champions League, a competition which has regularly been a source of frustration for the north-west club since they became mega-rich.

You might think City are too skinny at 4/5 for the win considering they are facing a side who were only second to Barcelona last term, having beaten Real Madrid over two legs in the semi-final.

However, Juventus have taken just a point from their opening three Serie A matches, experiencing a Chelsea-like start to the season.

Andreas Pirlo has left the Turin club and the Old Lady needed a late penalty to claim their first point of the season against Chievo on Saturday.

Paulo Dybala is an exciting prospect, with the Argentine having scored twice so far this season after a big money arrival from Palermo in the summer.

However, it will be a tall order to break past Vincent Kompany and Eliquiam Mangala, with Yaya Toure also enjoying a fast start to the campaign and his box-to-box play often lights up European evenings like this.

Let’s stick with the English club to get one over Juve, with David Silva’s return to the team a big plus, while Raheem Sterling is also fit and ready to cause havoc with his pace.

Wilfried Bony should be an able deputy to Aguero, with the Ivorian’s physical presence allowing the attacking trident to come forward at every turn.

Betting Tip: Man City @ 4/5 with bet365

All odds were correct at time of posting.

Leave a Reply